Aktuelle Fragen des med.-wiss. Publikationswesens (Teil 1)

Aus PlusPedia
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
Entstehender Artikel
LOGO
Freie Übersichtsartikel [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115]
Wichtige Übersichtsartikel
Medline Suchterm/ Synonyme
Was ist das
Struktur
Physiologie
Knockout
Transgen
Mutation
Polymorphismus
Genexpression
Inhibitoren
Agonisten


Bibliographie

  1. ↑ Doctors who write literature may be considered to have crossed from science to the humanities obtaining release from the rigid constraints of logic, experiment and fact, and gaining the freedoms of imagination, metaphor and fiction. Brain 132(Pt 1):1-2 (2009) PMID 19168453
  2. ↑ The publishing game: reflections of an editorial team. Lab Invest 88(12):1258-63 (2008) PMID 19020521
  3. ↑ Can impact factor data be trusted? Lab Invest 88(4):340-1 (2008) PMID 18299702
  4. ↑ The impact of review articles. Lab Invest 87(12):1174-85 (2007) PMID 17952095
  5. ↑ Predicting impact factor one year in advance. Lab Invest 87(6):520-6 (2007) PMID 17417666
  6. ↑ Original research in pathology: judgment, or evidence-based medicine? Lab Invest 87(2):104-14 (2007) PMID 17318193
  7. ↑ The road to publication is sometimes paved with bad intentions. J Histochem Cytochem 39(3):379 (1991) PMID 1993832
  8. ↑ Open access. J Histochem Cytochem 53(1):1-2 (2005) PMID 15637332
  9. ↑ Comments on the NIH enhanced public access policy. J Histochem Cytochem 53(9):1041 (2005) PMID 16157520
  10. ↑ Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry editorial policies and ethical guidelines. J Histochem Cytochem 54(2):129-30 (2006) PMID 16418501
  11. ↑ Publish and perish: the future fate of not-for-profit society-sponsored journals? J Histochem Cytochem 55(10):981-2 (2007) PMID 17875660
  12. ↑ Scientific misconduct: the ultimate negative career move. Anat Rec 261(6):219-20 (2000) PMID 11135180
  13. ↑ Impact factors: use and abuse in biomedical research. Anat Rec 257(2):54-7 (1999) PMID 10321432
  14. ↑ An open challenge. Open access and the challenges for scientific publishing. EMBO Rep 9(5):404-8 (2008) PMID 18451762
  15. ↑ Access evolved? Versatile open access policies are evolving together with scholarly information, but copyright issues remain unsettled. EMBO Rep 9(4):317-21 (2008) PMID 18379582
  16. ↑ The write position. A survey of perceived contributions to papers based on byline position and number of authors. EMBO Rep 8(11):988-91 (2007) PMID 17972896
  17. ↑ How many scientific papers should be retracted? EMBO Rep 8(5):422-3 (2007) PMID 17471252
  18. ↑ Writing readable prose: when planning a scientific manuscript, following a few simple rules has a large impact. EMBO Rep 7(9):846-9 (2006) PMID 16953194
  19. ↑ Is political correctness damaging science? Peer pressure and mainstream thinking may discourage novelty and innovation. EMBO Rep 6(5):405-7 (2005) PMID 15864289
  20. ↑ Engendering creativity in the biomedical sciences. Innovation can be stifled inadvertently or intentionally. Fortunately there are several ways in which scientists can foster creativity. EMBO Rep 6(5):402-4 (2005) PMID 15864288
  21. ↑ Open access and closed options. EMBO Rep 5(10):921 (2004) PMID 15459740
  22. ↑ Who did what? Uneasiness with the current authorship is prompting the scientific community to seek alternatives. EMBO Rep 5(5):446-8 (2004) PMID 15184973
  23. ↑ Ethical profits from publishing. EMBO Rep 5(1):1 (2004) PMID 14710173
  24. ↑ The essential role of peer review. EMBO Rep 2(9):743 (2001) PMID 11559578
  25. ↑ Having an impact (factor). Genome Biol 9(7):107 (2008) PMID 18671833
  26. ↑ Open-source software accelerates bioinformatics. Genome Biol 4(9):336 (2003) PMID 12952530
  27. ↑ You wrote it; you own it! J Exp Med 205(5):996-7 (2008) PMID 18450643
  28. ↑ Irreproducible results: a response to Thomson Scientific. J Exp Med 205(2):260-1 (2008) PMID 18187691
  29. ↑ eTBLAST: a web server to identify expert reviewers, appropriate journals and similar publications. Nucleic Acids Res 35(Web Server issue):W12-5 (2007) PMID 17452348
  30. ↑ PAH Mutation Analysis Consortium Database: 1997. Prototype for relational locus-specific mutation databases. Nucleic Acids Res 26(1):220-5 (1998) PMID 9399840
  31. ↑ Structural requirements of oleosin domains for subcellular targeting to the oil body. Plant Physiol 109(4):1353-61 (1995) PMID 8539295
  32. ↑ Real lives and white lies in the funding of scientific research: the granting system turns young scientists into bureaucrats and then betrays them. PLoS Biol 7(9):e1000197 (2009) PMID 19753105
  33. ↑ Equity for open-access journal publishing. PLoS Biol 7(8):e1000165 (2009) PMID 19652697
  34. ↑ PLoS Biology at 5: the future is open access. PLoS Biol 6(10):e267 (2008) PMID 18959486
  35. ↑ Progress toward public access to science. PLoS Biol 6(4):e101 (2008) PMID 18399723
  36. ↑ When is open access not open access? PLoS Biol 5(10):e285 (2007) PMID 17941723
  37. ↑ An incentive solution to the peer review problem. PLoS Biol 5(4):e107 (2007) PMID 17439298
  38. ↑ Open access to research is in the public interest. PLoS Biol 5(2):e48 (2007) PMID 17298181
  39. ↑ Author sequence and credit for contributions in multiauthored publications. PLoS Biol 5(1):e18 (2007) PMID 17227141
  40. ↑ ONE for all: the next step for PLoS. PLoS Biol 4(11):e401 (2006) PMID 17523266
  41. ↑ Open access increases citation rate. PLoS Biol 4(5):e176 (2006) PMID 16683866
  42. ↑ Opening access to cell biology. PLoS Biol 3(12):e426 (2005) PMID 17593892
  43. ↑ Scientific longevity. PLoS Biol 3(11):e409 (2005) PMID 16277561
  44. ↑ Published and not perished. PLoS Biol 3(10):e367 (2005) PMID 17523264
  45. ↑ Replication publication. PLoS Biol 3(9):e327 (2005) PMID 16149852
  46. ↑ Peer review--the newcomers' perspective. PLoS Biol 3(9):e326 (2005) PMID 16149851
  47. ↑ Measures of impact. PLoS Biol 3(8):e296 (2005) PMID 17523263
  48. ↑ Guidelines for negotiating scientific collaboration. PLoS Biol 3(6):e217 (2005) PMID 15941361
  49. ↑ Whose copy? Whose rights? PLoS Biol 2(7):E228 (2004) PMID 15252465
  50. ↑ Open access and scientific societies. PLoS Biol 2(5):E156 (2004) PMID 15138514
  51. ↑ Who pays for open access? PLoS Biol 2(4):E105 (2004) PMID 15094807
  52. ↑ Systematic differences in impact across publication tracks at PNAS. PLoS One 4(12):e8092 (2009) PMID 19956649
  53. ↑ Does publication in top-tier journals affect reviewer behavior? PLoS One 4(7):e6283 (2009) PMID 19621085
  54. ↑ How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One 4(5):e5738 (2009) PMID 19478950
  55. ↑ Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS One 3(8):e3081 (2008) PMID 18769481
  56. ↑ Effectiveness of journal ranking schemes as a tool for locating information. PLoS One 3(2):e1683 (2008) PMID 18301760
  57. ↑ Poor reporting of scientific leadership information in clinical trial registers. PLoS One 3(2):e1610 (2008) PMID 18286168
  58. ↑ Does the committee peer review select the best applicants for funding? An investigation of the selection process for two European molecular biology organization programmes. PLoS One 3(10):e3480 (2008) PMID 18941530
  59. ↑ External validation of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS One 2(12):e1350 (2007) PMID 18159233
  60. ↑ Inflated impact factors? The true impact of evolutionary papers in non-evolutionary journals. PLoS One 2(10):e999 (2007) PMID 17912376
  61. ↑ Statistical reviewers improve reporting in biomedical articles: a randomized trial. PLoS One 2(3):e332 (2007) PMID 17389922
  62. ↑ The most influential journals: Impact Factor and Eigenfactor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(17):6883-4 (2009) PMID 19380731
  63. ↑ Statistical analysis of the National Institutes of Health peer review system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(32):11076-80 (2008) PMID 18663221
  64. ↑ Making research accessible: National Institutes of Health (NIH) public access and PNAS open access policies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(15):5303 (2005) PMID 15809413
  65. ↑ National Academy of Sciences endorses National Institutes of Health plan for enhanced access to research information. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(42):14991 (2004) PMID 15479758
  66. ↑ Results of a PNAS author survey on an open access option for publication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(5):1111 (2004) PMID 14762162
  67. ↑ Webcasting is not publication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(14):8039 (2003) PMID 12851455
  68. ↑ Unfettered access to published results. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(15):8159 (2001) PMID 11447298
  69. ↑ PubMed Central: The GenBank of the published literature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(2):381-2 (2001) PMID 11209037
  70. ↑ Making back issues of PNAS online free. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(3):955 (2000) PMID 10655464
  71. ↑ Power to the people: PubMed Central. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(1):1 (2000) PMID 10618358
  72. ↑ On becoming a scientist. Science 326(5955):916 (2009) PMID 19965482
  73. ↑ Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system. Science 322(5909):1797-8 (2008) PMID 19095928
  74. ↑ Reduce administrative burden. Science 322(5908):1609 (2008) PMID 19074314
  75. ↑ The misused impact factor. Science 322(5899):165 (2008) PMID 18845714
  76. ↑ Scientific publishing standards. Science 321(5894):1271 (2008) PMID 18772400
  77. ↑ Reviewing peer review. Science 321(5885):15 (2008) PMID 18599743
  78. ↑ Just give them grants. Science 320(5878):849 (2008) PMID 18487160
  79. ↑ New career paths for scientists. Science 320(5874):289 (2008) PMID 18420902
  80. ↑ Salary survey. Science 314(5800):725 (2006) PMID 17082423
  81. ↑ Research funding: peer review at NIH. Science 311(5757):41 (2006) PMID 16400135
  82. ↑ U.S. budget. House 'peer review' kills two NIH grants. Science 309(5731):29-31 (2005) PMID 15994492
  83. ↑ A dangerous signal to science. Science 306(5705):2163 (2004) PMID 15618489
  84. ↑ Information access. NIH public access policy. Science 306(5703):1895 (2004) PMID 15591188
  85. ↑ Access for all? Science 304(5679):1875 (2004) PMID 15218109
  86. ↑ Global health and university patents. Science 301(5640):1629 (2003) PMID 14500943
  87. ↑ Research assessment in the UK. Science 296(5569):805 (2002) PMID 11988538
  88. ↑ To publish or not to publish. Science 295(5561):1793 (2002) PMID 11884720
  89. ↑ New directions for biomedical science. Science 295(5555):585 (2002) PMID 11809940
  90. ↑ Reflections on a retraction. Science 289(5482):1137 (2000) PMID 10970223
  91. ↑ A Hippocratic Oath for scientists. Science 286(5444):1475 (1999) PMID 10610545
  92. ↑ Public access to data. Science 283(5405):1114 (1999) PMID 10075568
  93. ↑ The importance of reviewers. Science 283(5403):789 (1999) PMID 10049118
  94. ↑ Publishing controversial research. Science 282(5391):1045 (1998) PMID 9841446
  95. ↑ The rightness of copyright. Science 281(5382):1451 (1998) PMID 9750113
  96. ↑ Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 280(5364):698-701 (1998) PMID 9563938
  97. ↑ Rethinking grant peer review. Science 275(5305):1399 (1997) PMID 9072799
  98. ↑ Financial interests constrain drug development. Science 275(5298):287 (1997) PMID 9005546
  99. ↑ Seeking an international dialogue on research integrity. Cell 131(1):9-11 (2007) PMID 17923078
  100. ↑ Research collaborations: trial, trust, and truth. Cell 126(5):823-5 (2006) PMID 16959557
  101. ↑ American Idol and NIH Grant Review. Cell 126(4):637-8 (2006) PMID 16923379
  102. ↑ Growing pains for NIH grant review. Cell 125(5):823-5 (2006) PMID 16751088
  103. ↑ Raising the bar for gene patents. Curr Biol 11(4):R115-6 (2001) PMID 11250161
  104. ↑ The art of grant writing. Curr Biol 9(11):R387 (1999) PMID 10359704
  105. ↑ A text-mining perspective on the requirements for electronically annotated abstracts. FEBS Lett 582(8):1178-81 (2008) PMID 18328824
  106. ↑ Manually structured digital abstracts: a scaffold for automatic text mining. FEBS Lett 582(8):1170 (2008) PMID 18328823
  107. ↑ Linking entries in protein interaction database to structured text: the FEBS Letters experiment. FEBS Lett 582(8):1171-7 (2008) PMID 18328820
  108. ↑ Fundamental research is the basis for understanding and treatment of many human diseases. FEBS Lett 580(23):5430-5 (2006) PMID 16806190
  109. ↑ Promoting basic research in Europe. FEBS Lett 563(1-3):1-2 (2004) PMID 15063712
  110. ↑ Strong support from the scientific community to the idea of establishing a European Research Council within the Life Sciences. FEBS Lett 539(1-3):1 (2003) PMID 12650915
  111. ↑ A role for Federation of European Biochemical Societies (FEBS) in the European Research Area (ERA). FEBS Lett 531(3):383 (2002) PMID 12435579
  112. ↑ Medical device development: from prototype to regulatory approval. Circulation 109(25):3068-72 (2004) PMID 15226221
  113. ↑ American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association clinical practice guidelines: Part I: where do they come from? Circulation 107(23):2979-86 (2003) PMID 12814985
  114. ↑ Dishonesty in medicine revisited. Tex Heart Inst J 35(1):6-15 (2008) PMID 18427644
  115. ↑ Of abstracts and manuscripts. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(6):1224-5 (2006) PMID 16545655
Abgerufen von „http://de.pluspedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aktuelle_Fragen_des_med.-wiss._Publikationswesens_(Teil_1)&oldid=951337“

Diesen Artikel melden!
Verletzt dieser Artikel deine Urheber- oder Persönlichkeitsrechte?
Hast du einen Löschwunsch oder ein anderes Anliegen? Dann nutze bitte unser Kontaktformular

PlusPedia Impressum
Diese Seite mit Freunden teilen:
Mr Wong Digg Delicious Yiggit wikio Twitter
Facebook


Bitte Beachte:
Sämtliche Aussagen auf dieser Seite sind ohne Gewähr.
Für die Richtigkeit der Aussagen übernimmt die Betreiberin keine Verantwortung.
Nach Kenntnissnahme von Fehlern und Rechtsverstößens ist die Betreiberin selbstverständlich bereit,
diese zu beheben.

Verantwortlich für jede einzelne Aussage ist der jeweilige Erstautor dieser Aussage.
Mit dem Ergänzen und Weiterschreiben eines Artikels durch einen anderen Autor
werden die vorhergehenden Aussagen und Inhalte nicht zu eigenen.
Die Weiternutzung und Glaubhaftigkeit der Inhalte ist selbst gegenzurecherchieren.


Typo3 Besucherzähler - Seitwert blog counter
java hosting vpn norway